Difference between revisions of "Load balancer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "HAProxy is a good load balancer. AWS "Elastic Load Balancer" (ELB) - now called 'Classic Load Balancer' is not so capable. But it does cost a lot, so there's that feature ;-...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | HAProxy is a good load balancer. | + | == HAProxy == |
| + | '''High Availability Proxy''' (HAProxy) is a good load balancer. Here you can read the docs about [https://www.haproxy.com/doc/aloha/7.0/haproxy/tls.html HAProxy support for TLS] and the community docs at https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#2.1 Read more at https://haproxy.org | ||
| + | == NGINX == | ||
| + | NGINX is also a good load balancer. Check [https://www.nginx.com/blog/aws-alb-vs-nginx-plus/ this comparison] I know 'feature lists' made by the vendor tend to put a lot of gloss on their own products, but this is a fair comparison. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Other == | ||
AWS "Elastic Load Balancer" (ELB) - now called 'Classic Load Balancer' is not so capable. But it does cost a lot, so there's that feature ;-) | AWS "Elastic Load Balancer" (ELB) - now called 'Classic Load Balancer' is not so capable. But it does cost a lot, so there's that feature ;-) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
[[Category:System Architecture]] | [[Category:System Architecture]] | ||
Latest revision as of 08:46, 14 September 2017
HAProxy[edit | edit source]
High Availability Proxy (HAProxy) is a good load balancer. Here you can read the docs about HAProxy support for TLS and the community docs at https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/1.6/configuration.html#2.1 Read more at https://haproxy.org
NGINX[edit | edit source]
NGINX is also a good load balancer. Check this comparison I know 'feature lists' made by the vendor tend to put a lot of gloss on their own products, but this is a fair comparison.
Other[edit | edit source]
AWS "Elastic Load Balancer" (ELB) - now called 'Classic Load Balancer' is not so capable. But it does cost a lot, so there's that feature ;-)
